﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dental Marketing Tops Dentists&#8217; List of New Year&#8217;s Resolutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/189/dental-marketing-tops-dentists-list-of-new-years-resolutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/189/dental-marketing-tops-dentists-list-of-new-years-resolutions/</link>
	<description>Jim Du Molin offers dental marketing news and dental practice management advice for dentists.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 03:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: William Hiltz</title>
		<link>http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/189/dental-marketing-tops-dentists-list-of-new-years-resolutions/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>William Hiltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/?p=189#comment-117</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that the top 2 responses to your survey have both sides of the profit equation. (revenue – expense = profit)

#1: new patients = more revenue
#2: cut costs = less expense

Ergo: the top resolution for dentists is, “I want to earn more money” . This makes them no different than anyone else.

The problem with cutting costs (as I see it) is that some dentists focus on this item in a dysfunctional manner. (e.g.: trying to cut dental supply costs one percentage point - say from 8% to 7% - if you do the after-tax math, you will see it is not worth the time spent)

Increasing costs is acceptable when the costs are overrun by an increase in revenue. (e.g.: marketing to get more patients) 

Increased costs are acceptable when they reduce the likelihood of a future liabilities. (disaster planning and recovery, fidelity insurance and fraud prevention) 
------------------------------------------------------------
William Hiltz BSc MBA CET
prosperident - Advisors to the Dental Profession
www.prosperident.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that the top 2 responses to your survey have both sides of the profit equation. (revenue – expense = profit)</p>
<p>#1: new patients = more revenue<br />
#2: cut costs = less expense</p>
<p>Ergo: the top resolution for dentists is, “I want to earn more money” . This makes them no different than anyone else.</p>
<p>The problem with cutting costs (as I see it) is that some dentists focus on this item in a dysfunctional manner. (e.g.: trying to cut dental supply costs one percentage point - say from 8% to 7% - if you do the after-tax math, you will see it is not worth the time spent)</p>
<p>Increasing costs is acceptable when the costs are overrun by an increase in revenue. (e.g.: marketing to get more patients) </p>
<p>Increased costs are acceptable when they reduce the likelihood of a future liabilities. (disaster planning and recovery, fidelity insurance and fraud prevention)<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
William Hiltz BSc MBA CET<br />
prosperident - Advisors to the Dental Profession<br />
<a href="http://www.prosperident.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.prosperident.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
