<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three of Four Dentists Have Dental Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/1258/three-of-four-dentists-have-dental-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/1258/three-of-four-dentists-have-dental-websites/</link>
	<description>Jim Du Molin offers dental marketing news and dental practice management advice for dentists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Visible Dentist</title>
		<link>http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/1258/three-of-four-dentists-have-dental-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-6145</link>
		<dc:creator>The Visible Dentist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/?p=1258#comment-6145</guid>
		<description>Wish I could trace the source of who started that misleading information about, &quot;you must constantly change your website&#039;s content ... to keep it current and ranked.&quot;

This is a statement apparently made by some armchair &quot;SEO&quot; in a forum or blog years ago and is now echoed across the Web like some sort of faith marketing mantra.

I&#039;ve built and ranked &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thevisibledentist.com/dental-websites.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;websites for dentists&lt;/a&gt; in the most competitive markets (cities) in the U.S. and they&#039;ve been positioned on the first page of Google for over half a decade -- and we&#039;ve never changed any content other than adding a new staff member, editing a photo, or some other minor element.

Most Web development firms look for creative ways to engage the dentist in an endless loop of recurring charges to keep the practice paying them forever, or until the dentist wises up and realizes they&#039;ve been taken to the cleaners.

John Barremore
Houston, TX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I could trace the source of who started that misleading information about, &#8220;you must constantly change your website&#8217;s content &#8230; to keep it current and ranked.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a statement apparently made by some armchair &#8220;SEO&#8221; in a forum or blog years ago and is now echoed across the Web like some sort of faith marketing mantra.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve built and ranked <a href="http://www.thevisibledentist.com/dental-websites.php" rel="nofollow">websites for dentists</a> in the most competitive markets (cities) in the U.S. and they&#8217;ve been positioned on the first page of Google for over half a decade &#8212; and we&#8217;ve never changed any content other than adding a new staff member, editing a photo, or some other minor element.</p>
<p>Most Web development firms look for creative ways to engage the dentist in an endless loop of recurring charges to keep the practice paying them forever, or until the dentist wises up and realizes they&#8217;ve been taken to the cleaners.</p>
<p>John Barremore<br />
Houston, TX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Dean Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/1258/three-of-four-dentists-have-dental-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-6088</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Dean Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/?p=1258#comment-6088</guid>
		<description>3 out of 4 have websites?  That&#039;s good-an improvement.  I wonder how many have blogs which are another great way to comunicate with patients.  The blogs that often seem to come with prepackaged websites are often unused with few posts, few comments and no interaction.  In other words, not a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 out of 4 have websites?  That&#8217;s good-an improvement.  I wonder how many have blogs which are another great way to comunicate with patients.  The blogs that often seem to come with prepackaged websites are often unused with few posts, few comments and no interaction.  In other words, not a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Three of Four Dentists Have Dental Websites &#124; Dental Marketing and Practice Management, Created by Camtasia Studio 5 -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/1258/three-of-four-dentists-have-dental-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-6086</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Three of Four Dentists Have Dental Websites &#124; Dental Marketing and Practice Management, Created by Camtasia Studio 5 -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewealthydentist.com/blog/?p=1258#comment-6086</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kim K., Wealthy Dentist. Wealthy Dentist said: Three of Four Dentists Have Dental Websites http://dlvr.it/2djzJ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kim K., Wealthy Dentist. Wealthy Dentist said: Three of Four Dentists Have Dental Websites <a href="http://dlvr.it/2djzJ" rel="nofollow">http://dlvr.it/2djzJ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

