Comments on: Dentists Want a Dental License That’s National

By: medical malpractice claim

medical malpractice claim — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:40:00 +0000

Medical malpractice lawsuits are quite costly. In almost all medical
malpractice cases, medical expert witnesses will need to be retained in
order to prove or defend against a malpractice claim. Financial expert
witnesses will also be required to prove the costs of any future medical
care will be needed and other economic damage suffered by the plaintiff
due to the injuries resulting from the malpractice

By: Karen Sue

Karen Sue — Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:04:47 +0000

I am a Dental Hygienist in Texas. I grew up in the Palm Beach area and want to go back. Florida is the worse state to get your license in. They want me to take the written national again after 17 years and then take a clinical. The clinical would be easy but no way would I ever pass the national. It looks like I need a new career if I want to move back.

By: Dentist National Requirements: OSHA, HIPAA, etc. |

Dentist National Requirements: OSHA, HIPAA, etc. | — Tue, 11 May 2010 18:06:31 +0000

[...] accepting license by credentials, so I would think that we’re heading to something of a more national dental license program, which would then equalize the national [...]

By: Blogs: The Week in Review (September 21-25, 2009)

Blogs: The Week in Review (September 21-25, 2009) — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:37:49 +0000

[...] Dentists Want a Dental License That’s National The Wealthy Dentist Blog reports in this post that 86% of survey respondents indicated that they [...]

By: david szczesny dmd

david szczesny dmd — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:45:33 +0000

what percentage of dentists are members of the a.d.a in good standing?how many are specialists ? give us a breakdown! should be interesting to know!

By: Tweets that mention Editorial-1-Sparaga -- Topsy.com

Tweets that mention Editorial-1-Sparaga -- Topsy.com — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:00:14 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Quantum Labs, Dental Assistant and ASMDT. ASMDT said: Dentists Want a Dental License That’s National http://bit.ly/c7GQV #prosthology #dentist #medical #health #dentist_tech #news [...]

By: Brian H Carr DDS

Brian H Carr DDS — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:10:13 +0000

The issue is not about protecting patient care or the level of dental education. It is purely a restraint of trade ploy by the state boards who, in the guise of protecting the patients, are actually protecting their “turf” and economic health of their practices by limiting the influx of new dentists and the competition that would bring. The egos involved in this issue will always use the “patient protection” argument for having clinical examination but it is too obviously a protectionism of the existing practices. Times have changed. It’s so expensive to set up an appropriate practice, that it is a self limiting factor for how many new practices an area can support. States that are trying to address access to care issues will readily accept a national license at some point. It is obvious that it is time for a national license, and the public needs the dental boards to accept reciprocity across all states for properly accredited dental professionals. ADA member and practicing since 1982.

By: RRoelofs DDS

RRoelofs DDS — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:47:40 +0000

Please list states that currently allow reciprocity and any specific requirements.

By: david szczesny dmd

david szczesny dmd — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:30:06 +0000

what percentage of respondents are a.d.a. members? how long have they been in private practice? how many malpractice lawsuits have been imposed on them? next survey please!!

By: Robert J Houchin DDS

Robert J Houchin DDS — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:21:05 +0000

Why does it “Make Sense” that you should practice for 5 years before you can move.
I have been practicing since 1978 and there has been this battle between West Coast and East Coast my entire career.
Each thinks their methods are superior.
I do not see people’s teeth failing on either coast so obviously each method has equal value.
It is nothing more than political protectionism. It restrains Free Trade and drives up prices.
I am in agreement that the ADA has its head in the sand on this issue.